(408) 432-9900

Solar Hot Water Cost Analysis for 50 Unit Apt Buildings in CA, AZ, OR, and NV

We’ve been playing around with our new solar thermal calculators, and we just thought we’d share some interesting cost comparisons. We took the example of a 50 unit apartment building and plugged in four different Western states: California, Arizona, Oregon, and Nevada.

You can see the full numbers below, but to our surprise, guess which state had the fastest return on investment (ROI) for this 50 unit building? Without the calculator, I would have guessed California. No brainer, right?

Wrong. Hands down, in these four states, the fastest solar hot water ROI for this 50 unit apartment building example is the great solar state of Arizona at a little over a year. And the worst? Nevada, with an ROI over 11 years. That being said, solar thermal systems can last for 25 years or more, so even in Nevada, solar thermal is a valuable investment.

The full numbers are below, but you can always run them again for yourself. Better yet, play, have fun by:

  • Changing the parameters to larger or smaller apartment buildings and do your own case studies.
  • Plugging in any of the other 50 states and Puerto Rico
  • Changing the parameters from an apartment building to a hotel, restaurant, one of the other listed categories.

Keep in mind, however, that these are estimated retail costs. If you’re a Free Hot Water solar installer or distributor, you’ll of course benefit from substantial discounts off the estimated installed costs.

(Click twice to enlarge)

 

(Click twice to enlarge)

(Click twice to enlarge)

 

(Click twice to enlarge)

 

(Click twice to enlarge)

This entry was posted in Hotel Solar Hot Water, Restaurant Solar Hot Water, Solar Hot Water for Apartment Buildings, solar hot water resources, Solar Thermal Economics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Solar Hot Water Cost Analysis for 50 Unit Apt Buildings in CA, AZ, OR, and NV

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Solar Hot Water Cost Analysis for 50 Unit Apt Buildings in CA, AZ, OR, and NV | Free Hot Water Blog, Free Hot Water Solar Water Heating Blog -- Topsy.com

  2. Bob Bullach says:

    Using the Section 179 depreciation rule as done in the calculator is wrong. Depreciation expense is not $ for $, but taken at the marginal tax rate of the customer. If we assume the customer pays 20% in taxes, this increases the payback in CA from 4.78 years to about 13 years. BIG DIFFERENCE.

  3. Solar Fred says:

    Bob, you’re correct, but you can adjust the tax rate on the calculator and it will change the result. You just have to know what your tax rate is when you fill out the calculator. Most businesses should know this.

    –SF